Joe Jonas Reacts To Sophie Turner’s “Misleading” Lawsuit Over Their 2 Kids

Joe Jonas & Sophie Turner'

The world of celebrity relationships is often under the microscope, with fans and media outlets alike scrutinizing every move of their favorite stars. The recent legal battle between former couple Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner has taken center stage, as Sophie files a lawsuit against Joe, alleging that he’s withholding their two daughters’ passports and preventing their return to England, her native country. As the drama unfolds, it’s essential to examine both sides of the story and understand the complexities of this high-profile case.


Joe Jonas, the renowned singer, and Sophie Turner, the accomplished actor, tied the knot in 2019, embarking on a journey that captivated fans around the world. However, their fairytale marriage took an unexpected turn when they filed for divorce on September 5, 2023, after four years of marriage. While this decision alone sparked headlines, it was the subsequent legal battle that truly shook the public’s perception of their relationship.

Joe Jonas & Sophie Turner'

Sophie’s Allegations

Sophie Turner’s lawsuit alleges that Joe Jonas is refusing to return their two daughters to England, where she hails from. At the heart of her complaint is the claim that Joe is holding their children’s passports, effectively preventing them from leaving the United States. This assertion has raised significant concerns and questions regarding the couple’s ongoing custody battle.

Joe’s Response

Joe Jonas, through his representative, swiftly responded to Sophie’s allegations. In a strongly worded statement, Joe’s representative explained the series of events leading up to the lawsuit. According to their statement, Joe initiated divorce proceedings in Florida, the appropriate jurisdiction for the case, following multiple conversations with Sophie. Importantly, they emphasize that Sophie was fully aware of Joe’s intentions to file for divorce.

Joe Jonas & Sophie Turner'

The statement also reveals that the Florida Court had already issued an order that restricted both parents from relocating the children. This order was served to Sophie on September 6, 2023, more than two weeks prior to her lawsuit.

An Amicable Co-Parenting Attempt

Perhaps the most surprising revelation in Joe’s response is the account of a cordial meeting between Joe and Sophie in New York, where they discussed co-parenting arrangements. According to the statement, they reached an understanding during this meeting to work together amicably for the sake of their children.

Joe Jonas & Sophie Turner'

However, the harmony was short-lived. Less than 24 hours after this “amicable co-parenting setup” was agreed upon, Sophie allegedly expressed her desire to take the children permanently to the UK. This sudden change in her stance prompted her to file the lawsuit, demanding that Joe hand over the children’s passports so she could take them out of the country.

Florida Court Order at the Center of the Conflict

One crucial aspect of this legal battle is the Florida Court order that restricts both parents from relocating the children. This order holds immense significance in determining the legality of Sophie’s demands. If Joe were to comply with her request and hand over the children’s passports, he would be in direct violation of the Florida Court order, further complicating the situation.


The ongoing legal battle between Joe Jonas and Sophie Turner is a complex and highly publicized case that has captured the attention of fans and media outlets alike. While Sophie alleges that Joe is withholding their children’s passports, Joe’s representative has provided a detailed response, shedding light on the events leading up to the lawsuit.

As the legal proceedings unfold, it remains to be seen how this high-profile custody dispute will be resolved. The situation serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by celebrity couples when it comes to navigating divorce and co-parenting, and it highlights the importance of understanding the full context of such disputes before passing judgment.